Господа! Помогите разобраться
прислали расшифровку отказа, что это значит?
The applicant’s claims
You applied for a Subclass 600 Visitor Visa Tourist Stream on 10 August 2017 to visit
Australia for tourism.
Information Considered
I am a delegated decision maker under Section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). In
reaching my decision, I have considered the following:
✃ relevant legislation contained in the Act and Migration Regulations 1994 (the
Regulations) collectively “migration law”;
✃ information contained in the department's Procedures Advice Manual 3;
✃ documents and information provided by the applicant(s); and
✃ other relevant information held on departmental files.
Reasons for Decision
Under migration law, an application is made for a class of visa and your application must be
considered against the criteria for all subclasses within that visa class.
Your application has been considered against the criteria for the following subclasses within
VISITOR visa class.
600 - VISITOR
600.211
- 2 -
Australian Embassy, Moscow
OFFICE:Immigration & Visa Section 10A/2 Podkolokolny Per Moscow 109028
POSTAL:Podkolokolny Pereulok 10A/2 Moscow 109028
PHONE: 0044 207 420 3691 CONTACT VIA:
www.border.gov.au/forms/europe WEBSITE:
www.border.gov.au,
www.russia.embassy.gov.auThe applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the
visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
After considering the information you have provided as evidence of your purpose in visiting
Australia I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay in Australia temporarily for the
purpose for which the visa is granted.
In assessing whether or not you intend a genuine temporary stay I have taken into account
the information provided in the application relating to your personal circumstances, previous
international travel, commitments and incentives to return home.
I find from the application that you have failed to adequately demonstrate strong employment
and other commitments that may support the likelihood of your compliance with the
conditions attached to the visa and your return home at the end of your proposed stay in
Australia.
While I have noted your employment as an economist at project Bureau, the provided
documentation was not sufficient to satisfy me that your employment may serve as a strong
incentive for you to return.
Please note that in making this decision I have taken into account your previous international
travel. However, having weighed all the relevant factors and considered the purpose of the
visit, I find that the proposed travel is inconsistent with your personal circumstances.
Having taken all relevant aspects of your application into account, I am not satisfied that you
genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted.
You have therefore failed to satisfy Regulation 600.211.
Decision
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do
not meet the criteria for the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.
Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa
lodged at Moscow