"My decision is based on the following factors
I have carefully considered the information provided with the application including your
claims about your personal, employment and financial situation in the home country/the
country of usual residence.
I note that you provided evidence of employment at ***** Ltd since 2010 where you work as
office manager. While I acknowledge that the employment may provide some incentive to
return, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that you intend to depart Australia within the validity
of her visa. You also stated that your travel will be funded by the inviter onshore. While I note
the support of the inviter in Australia to cover the costs of the trip, your personal financial
standings lead me to question whether your personal circumstances in home country are
such, that they may induce you to remain in Australia beyond the intended stay.
While I acknowledge receipt of the documents from the inviter onshore, based on the
evidence before me, I cannot be satisfied that you demonstrated sufficient personal,
employment or financial ties to the country of usual residence, which would provide a strong
incentive to return or abide by visa conditions should the visa be granted.
After consideration of all your personal circumstances I find that you do not meet the criteria
for a Visitor Visa – Tourist stream as you have not demonstrated that you genuinely intend to
stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted.
Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211
in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations."
Хочу сразу сказать, что намерений там остаться у меня нет. Дома у меня остаются престарелые родители и не совершенолетняя дочь (я являюсь единственным родителем).
Мой вопрос вот в чем... Достаточно ли будет показать, что у меня есть личные сбережения, примерно по 100$ США на день прибывания? Или подать на спонсорскую визу, где он будет приглашать меня как де-факто партнёр? Благодарю за любой ответ и совет!