http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Welf ... Criticisms
Есть ссылка на норвежское издание:
http://www.tnp.no/norway/panorama/2704- ... arnevernet
В ней кроме всего прочего указывается, что деятельность этой организации беспокоит не только русских и индусов:
In fact, the practices of Barnevern do not only worry Russians and Indians. There is a deep rooted skepticism among local groups towards an increased use of home based measures. A report prepared by Gruppen til Familiens Selvstendige Rett (GFSR), Redd Våre Barn (RVB) and BarnasRett concludes that current practices in the Norwegian Child Protection system are not compatible with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Также указывается, что организация практикует изъятия основываясь на анонимных доносах, и при этом не удосуживает себя проверкой надежности полученной информации. Также указывается, что психологи получают хорошие деньги за "отчеты" :
Professor of linguistics at the University of Bergen, Marianne Haslev Skånland points out another problematic dimension of the child welfare system. According to Skånland, it is turning into an industry, which pays incredible amounts, especially to psychologists, for “reports” and to foster “parents”. They advertise for people to be foster parents and announce a yearly pay of, say, NOK 430.000 (€ 30.000) plus paid holidays and regular “time off” from the foster children plus allowances for building their house or buying an extra car plus pension entitlement. The business also, of course, provides extra income and extra jobs for social workers, writes Skånland. She also notes that child care cases often rely on information from anonymous sources. She thinks one never knows who the sources are, and whether the sources are reliable. Or whether the sources possess first hand information, or are pure rumors.
Прошу прощения за то, что не привел источники на норвежском языке, так как я в нем крайне слаб
